Why don't the Kobe haters bash paul pierce now for not winning without garnett and allen?

They only said pierce was the better player because they root for whoever was playing against kobe last year. pierce barely won over 20 games the year before the garnett and allen trade, while the Lakers at least made the playoffs. And shaq didn't singlehandly win a title without kobe, because he didn't put up big stats in the 2006 finals and his role was reduced due to his age.